What today’s oil tells us about tomorrow’s spill response

Fishing vessels pull oil spill boom.

The Council has released a new analysis of Alaska North Slope crude oil. Every few years, the Prince William Sound tanker operators share a sample from the trans-Alaska pipeline with the Council. The sample is tested to determine the current mix of substances that make up the oil.

Why does Alaska North Slope crude oil differ over time?

The oil that runs through the trans-Alaska pipeline comes from a mixture of oil fields across the North Slope. Over the years, new pockets of oil have been discovered, while production in some older fields has declined. This leads to changes in the oil moving through the pipeline.

What are the differences?

Crude oils are generally categorized by weight: heavy, medium, or light. Heavy oils have mostly larger hydrocarbon molecules. In lighter oils, the molecules are smaller, having been further broken down by exposure to hotter temperatures and higher pressures in the earth’s crust.

Light oil is less dense, meaning a given volume weighs less than heavier oils, and less viscous, meaning it flows easily. Heavy oil is denser and more viscous. Medium weight oils contain a mix of heavier and lighter molecules.

At the refinery, these light and heavy components are separated so they can be used for different purposes. The lighter ends are made into products such as jet fuel and gasoline, while the heavier ends are used to pave roads and coat pipes, among other uses.

Alaska North Slope oil has been trending lighter since around 2010. Its properties are consistent with a medium weight oil.

Why do these differences matter to oil spill response?

Knowing the composition of oil tells emergency responders how the oil might behave if spilled. Responders can create better contingency plans and choose more appropriate cleanup techniques.

Lighter weight oils are easier to recover and clean up, and they tend to evaporate more readily. Heavier oils move slower, so they may not penetrate soils as quickly, but they are harder to skim and pump during cleanup.

What do the current oil properties tell us?

After receiving the recent sample, the Council had it analyzed by a laboratory and worked with Dr. Merv Fingas, a spill response subject matter expert, to interpret the data. In the report just released, Dr. Fingas identified changes in the oil properties and described what those changes might mean for oil spill responders.

Dr. Fingas concluded that the oil is relatively similar to the last sample he analyzed for the Council. However, he noted a few differences.

Less prone to emulsify: Dr. Fingas found that the current composition is less prone to form stable emulsions than older samples. An emulsion forms when droplets of one liquid are dispersed into another liquid. When oil is spilt into seawater, wind and waves churn the two liquids together. Usually, oil and water separate, however sometimes the mixture stabilizes and forms “mousse,” so named because it resembles chocolate mousse dessert. Mousse is difficult to recover and can greatly increase the volume of oil to clean up.

Less dispersible as the oil weathers: When fresh oil is spilled, it begins to change almost immediately. Lighter compounds start to evaporate when exposed to air and water, leaving behind the heavier components. Dr. Fingas notes that the current crude mix is less dispersible after weathering than previous samples.

Flows more readily: Dr. Fingas’ report also says that since the recent sample is lighter, it is less viscous. This means that the oil would be easier to collect and pump, however it would spread farther and faster than oil of the past.

More details in Dr. Fingas’ report: Review of the 2024 Alaska North Slope Oil Properties Relevant to Environmental Assessment and Prediction

New testing protocols lead to change in dispersant products

The photo shows the underside of an airplane with piping that is designed to spray liquid dispersants onto an oil spill.
Spill responders stockpile dispersants in strategic locations so that they can be loaded onto a plane like this one, which is fitted with special equipment for spraying dispersants onto an oil spill.

The oil spill response industry is changing products used to disperse spilled oil. This change stemmed from new protocols put in place by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, for testing dispersants.

The EPA maintains a list of products that have gone through a testing process and met the established thresholds for listing.

The manufacturer of Corexit 9500A, the product that made up the stockpile in Alaska and elsewhere, recently discontinued manufacturer, sale, and regulatory support. Corexit 9500A will no longer be included on the EPA list after December 12, 2025.

The stockpile of dispersants in Alaska is maintained by the Marine Spill Response Corporation, or MSRC, a nationwide company that supports oil spill response incidents. They own and maintain stockpiles of equipment and trained response personnel that can be deployed across the U.S. Their warehouse in Anchorage is now home to about 60,000 gallons of a new product, Dasic EcoSafe OSD.

Makeup of new dispersant is unclear

According to its Safety Data Sheet, or SDS, Dasic EcoSafe contains four surfactants and two solvents.

Surfactants are substances that reduce the surface tension of a liquid, allowing it to spread more easily. For example, shampoo contains surfactants that remove oil from hair.

Solvents are substances, usually liquid, that can dissolve another substance. For example, water acts as a solvent in the digestive system, dissolving nutrients from food and delivering it into the bloodstream.

The SDS lists the same surfactants and solvents in Dasic EcoSafe as Corexit, however the amounts and ratios cannot be determined from public data.

There is not much publicly available data about the new dispersant other than the SDS. In addition, testing methods to determine toxicity have changed in recent years so comparisons to previous products is difficult.

The tests conducted to gain the EPA’s approval were done on oil from locations in the Lower 48. Crude oil varies according to where it came out of the earth. Properties such as viscosity (whether a liquid is thick and flows slowly, or thin and faster flowing) or density (how compact the substance is) affect how the oil reacts with dispersants. Crude oil in the Lower 48 tends to be lighter and faster flowing than North Slope oil.

Plan for Corexit stockpile yet to be determined

The MSRC is considering several options for disposal of the existing Anchorage stockpile and expects to have a plan sometime in 2026.

Council co-hosts community workshop with local partners

Since 1999, the Chugach Regional Resources Commission, or CRRC, has been hosting the Annual Subsistence Memorial Gathering. This event, held near the anniversary of the Exxon Valdez oil spill, honors the resilience and adaptation of the people of the Chugach region after the disaster.

This year, the Council partnered with CRRC and Alaska Sea Grant to host a workshop during the Gathering to share with community members about current environmental and social science research in the Chugach region. An important goal was to hear ideas from community members about current and future project needs based on their experiences and local knowledge. In addition to the co-hosts, researchers from Alaska Pacific University, Seldovia Village Tribe, Fjord & Fish Sciences, Prince William Sound Science Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Kodiak Area Native Association, CRRC, and Kachemak Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve shared brief updates about their work. During morning and afternoon sessions, participants gathered in roundtable discussions. They were encouraged to consider how the research presented could be integrated into communities; what environmental or social science was needed in communities; ways to promote better community well-being through resilience and adaptation; and to share stories of change in the region.

Lessons from listening

Graphic with a quote from a scientist that attended The Gathering: "“Scientists need to be reminded (including me) to make their presentations understandable for the non-scientist.”One of the Council’s goals was to learn about research needs from community members. Discussion questions were designed to encourage stories about changes in their local environment. The Council hopes to be able to develop future projects in collaboration with communities based on this feedback and knowledge sharing.

A variety of key themes and lessons emerged from the conversations.

Communities encourage research that directly addresses local needs. People want to know more about what is happening in their environment and why. Many attendees told stories of how shifting seasons and climate change are affecting harvests of land and marine plants and animals. The variety of species available for harvest is also declining in some areas. Locally important species such as clams, herring, and salmon were of particular interest, and people also wanted to know how the health of plankton populations affects the rest of the food web.

Communication is key. Researchers tend to talk about their work in technical language and present their work in complicated spreadsheets filled with specialized data. These are not easy for non-scientists to understand or apply to their lives. The conversations during the workshop showed that people were interested in the research and wanted to know how to learn about these projects. Plain language and visual graphics can help improve communication.

Local knowledge holds important insight. Two-way communication also benefits researchers. People living in coastal communities notice changes before anyone else. They are the first to notice poor fishing, changes in harvestable species, and other factors that directly affect coastal communities and local ways of living. Listening to communities’ questions and observations can help shape the development and execution of research projects.

Keep showing up. Consistency is important in building relationships. Community members stressed the value of researchers returning to share project results and engaging youth in outreach and education as projects unfold.

More details in the report

The full report contains many more details, including ideas for projects and additional suggestions for building relationships with communities: 23rd Annual Subsistence Memorial Gathering Workshop

Funds available for educational projects related to our mission

Several students sit on a boardwalk above wetlands. They are writing and drawing observations about their surroundings in their journals.
Youth from across Prince William Sound participated in the Sound Connections program run by Prince William Sound Science Center in the summer of 2025, which was supported through a PWSRCAC Youth Involvement contract. Photo: Courtesy of PWSSC.

The Council works to educate Exxon Valdez region youth about the environmentally safe operation of the Alyeska terminal and associated tankers. Working with area youth is vital to fight complacency that can arise if new generations of citizens are not continually reminded of the need for ongoing oil spill prevention.

To support this effort, the Council invites proposals for facilitating learning experiences with Exxon Valdez oil spill region youth. Youth in this case can include students from K-12 formal education, homeschool students, informal education programs, and either formal or informal college-level education. In the past, the PWSRCAC has also sponsored projects for teachers that benefit area youth.

Now accepting proposals

We are currently accepting proposals for projects taking place during the summer of 2026.

Submittal Deadline: 11:59 p.m. on November 21, 2025
Award Announcement on or before January 31, 2026

Projects should result in better understanding of such topics as: citizens’ oversight, environmental impacts of the operation of the Alyeska Pipeline Service Company oil terminal in Valdez and the oil tankers that call there, oil spill prevention and response planning and operation, and/or other topics related to the Council’s mission.

Past and ongoing projects have included:

  • youth stewardship expeditions into the marine environment via sea kayak and other vessels
  • youth monitoring for aquatic invasive species
  • public oil spill science discovery labs
  • oil spill science and technology outreach
  • oil spill education website development
  • K-12 oil spill curriculum writing and testing
  • travel funding for youth presenting oil spill projects at conferences
  • oral history projects related to the Exxon Valdez oil spill
  • other marine stewardship programs for students with an oil spill connection
  • more information about past projects

Download RFP: Youth Involvement 2026 Summer

Questions?

Please contact Outreach Coordinator Maia Draper-Reich at education@pwsrcac.org.


More about the Council:

Future funding opportunities

There are two deadlines each year to submit proposals for educational project funding. You may subscribe to our email list for new Requests for Proposals to receive notifications when these are issued by the Council.

Skip to content