Electric current can find damage in underground liners

A new Council report shows how electricity can be used to “see” damage in the asphalt liners that are intended to contain oil in case of a spill at the Valdez Marine Terminal.

The terminal’s vast crude oil storage tanks are surrounded by a secondary containment system. This system consists of huge containment cells (two tanks per cell) that would act like a bathtub, holding the oil until it can be cleaned up.

To keep oil from leaking into the surrounding environment, these cells are lined with a special type of asphalt. About 5 feet of gravel fill sits on top of this liner.

These asphalt liners can become brittle with age and are susceptible to physical and chemical damage. Over the years, the gravel fill has been removed in a few places to visually inspect the liner. About 20% of the time, holes or cracks were found.

Removing all the fill to visually inspect and repair the liner would be an expensive and time-consuming project, and the excavation equipment could cause further damage to the liner. Alyeska is looking for ways to evaluate the liner without having to excavate.

To help identify the best liner testing methods, the Council has been working with Dr. Craig H. Benson, who has been teaching and practicing environmental and civil engineering for over 40 years, and has extensive experience in containment systems. A new report by Dr. Benson has several recommendations to help the Council provide advice to Alyeska regarding the secondary containment systems at the terminal in Valdez.

This image shows how electric current can flow through holes in a liner, allowing a technician with a sensor to locate damage in the liner.Dr. Benson evaluated several liner inspection techniques and determined that electrical leak location would likely be the best. This type of survey is done by applying electric currents to the ground outside the liner and measuring electric currents on the surface of the fill inside the liner. A solid liner would block the currents. Holes or cracks would allow the current to flow through. Currents that flow through the liner can be detected from the surface, allowing technicians to create a map of damaged areas.

Dr. Benson also analyzed how much of the liner would need to be tested to have confidence that the liner will reliably hold spilled oil. He determined that testing at least 20% of the liner would be enough to estimate how many holes may exist in the liner, with acceptable accuracy. However, 100% of the liner would need to be tested to find all the actual damage.

The importance of an undamaged liner

The Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation, or ADEC, gives Alyeska a 60% “prevention credit” because this secondary containment system is in place. This means that instead of having to provide response equipment to clean up a spill equal to the contents of the largest tank at the terminal (over 23 million gallons), Alyeska only has to provide response equipment and personnel to clean up a little over 8.5 million gallons.*

This is a substantial reduction in the amount of response personnel and equipment.

In May 2022, ADEC notified Alyeska that they needed to identify preliminary methods to evaluate the integrity of the liners by October 2023. Alyeska must identify final methods to evaluate these liners by March 2025.

Dr. Benson’s report is available online: Methodologies for Evaluating Defects in the Catalytically Blown Asphalt Liner in the Secondary Containment System at the Valdez Marine Terminal


*8.5 million gallons, or 204,180 barrels, is the volume of the largest tank, less a 5% prevention credit for drug/alcohol testing, 2% prevention credit for on-line leak detection, and 60% prevention credit for the secondary containment system.

Plankton change with the seasons in Prince William Sound

In this photo, a Council staff member holds a sample, which is green due to the tiny plants, or phytoplankton, in the sample.
Staff member Joe Lally holds a sample collected during the spring phytoplankton bloom.

A new Council study will help improve monitoring for invasive species, such as tunicates, that live on the sea floor or hard surfaces.

Researchers collected samples of zooplankton and used an identification technique called DNA metabarcoding. This technique allows researchers to identify multiple species from the same sample.

Read more

Cleaning up a big oil spill

A large spill would require equipment brought in from other regions. The Council recently sponsored a study on the availability of equipment on short notice.

The oil industry in Prince William Sound has one of the best-equipped spill prevention and response systems in the world. However, if a big spill were to occur, more equipment would still be needed.

Read more

Council updates position on dispersant use during an oil spill

Prevention and mechanical recovery should remain primary options

A vessel sprays water as practice for applying dispersants during an oil spill drill.
A vessel sprays water as practice for applying dispersants during an oil spill drill.

The Council’s Board of Directors has updated the organization’s position on use of chemical dispersants in the event of an oil spill in the Prince William Sound and the Exxon Valdez oil spill region. The updated position states that dispersants should not be used on Alaska North Slope crude oil spills in the waters of our region.

Chemical dispersants are substances applied to floating oil slicks that break the oil into smaller droplets that disperse into the water column.

The Council has long endorsed mechanical recovery as the primary tool to clean up an oil spill. Unlike dispersant use, mechanical recovery with booms and skimmers removes oil from the water. Conditions in Prince William Sound often limit the feasibility of dispersant application and dispersants have not been demonstrated to be effective in marine environments with similar temperatures and salinity levels to those found in the Sound. Uncertainty exists over the toxicity caused by adding chemical dispersants to an oil slick and the long-term effects of dispersants application are not well understood. The known harms and potential risks caused by dispersants, in addition to a lack of proven effectiveness and safety, preclude the Council from supporting dispersants.

Oil spill prevention remains the Council’s top priority because once oil is spilled there will always be adverse impacts to human health and the environment. In the event of an oil spill in our region, mechanical recovery and containment of oil spilled at sea should remain the primary response method. The Council also recommends that oil spill response research and development should focus on enhancing and improving mechanical recovery technologies and methods.

The Council’s previous position on dispersant use was adopted in 2006, after years of promoting research and testing to increase knowledge about dispersants and the environmental consequences of their use. In the intervening years, the Council has continued to track developments and analyze peer reviewed scientific literature from around the world regarding the use of dispersants. Discussion and work to develop this update have occurred over the past year, with the final approval taking place at the directors’ meeting in Seward, Alaska, on September 23, 2022.

Details

Further materials on the evidence and rationale supporting the position update are currently being finalized by the Council for publication in early 2023.


PDF of news release: 

PWSRCAC Dispersant Use Position Press Release 

Skip to content